GSN @ ITP

Every Bit You Make, thinking — andrew on March 3, 2007 at 5:04 pm

Christian Croft and I revamped a lecture we originally authored for out Every Bit You Make Final last year. Last night we unvieled a really nice new video edited by Christian and a quicker, slicker presentation. We gave the presentation on the floor at ITP and drew a nice crowd. Exactly what we wanted since the main reason for revisiting the lecture is to get some nicer documentation than the talk at EYEBEAM. We plan to use this documentation as a work sample for our submission to Ars Electronica.

- click to play -


also check out the podcastable version here: (coming soon)

Godaddy.com doesn’t support .m4v filetypes without paying $5/mo. Ridiculous.

Journal-Ism

Every Bit You Make — andrew on March 25, 2006 at 10:22 am

What do you want to say? How do you want to say it? What’s more, who do you want to know about it? We are a society of graphoholics. We all have a life. We all have an opinion. And, it seems, the majority of us have the need to write about it. And why not? A pen and a paper cost very little these days. The overhead for small-time authorship is next to nothing. We don’t need to be the next James Frey of the world. And hey, at least we are honest about ourselves. Besides, it’s not like we’d ever dream of publishing something like our very most personal experiences for all to see. Those things are private. Well, maybe you’ll tell your best friend. Or perhaps leak some gossip to the book club on Thursday nights. Once and a while you might let your support group know “how does that make you feel” but that’s as far as it goes. Communication and shared experience is one thing, our deepest darkest secrets are another.

Social networking aside and laundry lists not included, most of us write on a semi-regular basis to keep track of things in our daily lives. To remember the good times, explore the bad, banish the intolerable. Those of us who keep a journal do so for a myriad of reasons. Some free-write to let the ideas flow, unshackled from self-judgment in a stream-of-consciousness sort of prose. Some of us choose our words very very carefully so as to capture that perfect transcription of thought with just the right turn of the syntax. journaling is as long as the pages of the records themselves. Some of us simply log the day’s events for easy recall, sentimental or otherwise, at a later date. The list of reasons for personal What ever our reasons for writing personally, it is becoming evident that more and more of us are making our personal writing public. What once was kept under lock and key and guarded by big sister, is now accessible, and in some cases, advertised for public rummaging. Our innermost thoughts now worn on the outside. On the whole, the modern society used to be more akin to a shy pubescent teenager than to our present parallel with the prosaic and moderately annoying college philosophy major spouting his thoughts across the quad. I want to tell you what I think. I want you to know. As our notion of privacy has changed in the age of virtuality, so to has the fundamental notion of “ourselves.” The more we represent ourselves on-line, the less likely we are to be entirely truthful about that representation.

The tradition of writing in one’s journal usually involved a semi-private space with semi-private thoughts. You and your mind, free to think and write and express and explore and conspire as you please. Being able to admit things to ones-self has an enormous impact on the make-up of one’s being. Consistent journal-writers might even attain the level of pure disclosure to the page with no form of self-censorship whatsoever. We confide in the medium which is all our own. We dance a different dance however when we know that others may be watching.

25,595,766 hits to PostSecret and counting. PostSecret is a weblog whose simple rules state, “You are invited to anonymously contribute your secrets to PostSecret.” Ah. Anonymity. That’s where the popularity comes from. Catharsis with no consequence. But what about something more in line with our traditional notions of privacy. My-diary.org posits, “Everyone can have their own personal diary or journal on the Internet.” My own personal diary on the internet? What could be better? Reading other peoples personal diaries on the internet! The very first category heading on my-diary.org’s site entreats, “Read what others have written.” I would put forth that the overwhelming majority of my-diary.org’s users are not only well aware of the fact that their “personal diaries” are for all “on the internet” to see and read, but that they long for this kind of exposure. It changes the make-up of what they write. Dresses it up. Truths become liquid.

There is certainly nothing perverse about the human need for empathy and connectivity to a greater community. It is my position however that the more our society tends towards peddling our emotional wares through the annals of the web and the more we continue to raise future generations with this notion of personal expression, the less private, the less personal, the less meaningful, and the less truthful a web log or journal become. This is to say, the more we make it a habit to journal online rather than in a real-world journal, the more our relation to the truth of introspection changes due to the expectation of the content coming in contact with an eventual audience. As Sarah Boxer of the New York Times writes in a review of PostSecret from May of 2005,
The secret sharers here aren’t mindless flashers but practiced strippers. They don’t want to get rid of their secrets. They love them. They arrange them. They tend them. They turn them into fetishes. And that’s the secret of PostSecret. It isn’t really a true confessional after all. It is a piece of collaborative art.
Of course it’s exhibitionist, it’s modern art.

LiveJournal is another online “communication tool” that boasts some 9,861,091 journals created since 1999, and 307,253 post on the day this paper was submitted. The site informs us “you can use LiveJournal in many different ways: as a private journal, a blog, a social network…” A private journal and a social network? When deep in introspective thought, how does one reconcile the fact that the filtering mechanism one is using to funnel the bandwidth of stream-of-consciousness to the page is being affected by the fact that there is a good chance that a lot of people will read the content someday. Sites like these encourage us to take part in communities we may have otherwise never experienced, however, empirically they also encourage the creation and modification of our own attributes. We put our best (or worst) selves forward. But as we continue to experience reality in our lives ‘virtually’ and the line of separation gets dangerously thin between the two, we start to actually become the content of our own fabrications. We become self-fulfilling prophecies.

What does this mean then for future generations of would-be journal and diary keepers. If the current trend toward publicly viewable content continues, there will be no need for privacy concern any longer in our privacy obsessed United States of America. There will be laws passed against privacy. We will beg to be the next to have our secrets aired by the likes of Oprah and Dr. Phil. We are losing more and more ground in the fight for privacy because of our insatiable hunger with the concept of celebrity and the accompanying tendencies towards performative journaling. As our personal text becomes histrionic we sit back and laugh ourselves into oblivion and we will never question our methods, so long as we are entertained.

Online journaling removes the padding of privacy from writing and thus diminishes the truth and connection that a writer has to her text. I have decided to conduct an experiment with these thoughts in mind. I keep a student blog at http://www.itp.nyu.edu/~ajs510/blog. I invite people to see this blog and can imagine directing future collaborators to this site to get sense of my aesthetic and a cross-section of my graduate work here at NYU. For many years, I have also kept a physical journal. This journal, while mostly unread by anyone but myself is not at all private. I regularly leave a volume out in the open, flipped to a past entry that I may have been reading. Sometimes I’ll even voluntarily put my thoughts forth by reading from this record of daily thoughts and experiments in writing. A look back at some of the samplings of entries runs the gamut of the insufferably mundane to the eerily personal. Well, if I claim to be so frank and honest when documenting the day’s thoughts in this closable and geo-specific notebook even though it is not a private thing, then I should have no problem doing so on the internet. For the past couple of weeks I have been journaling as usual in my Mead Graph-ruled notebook on a semi-daily basis. The only catch is, now I scan it in and post it on the internet for all to see. The amount of privacy is relatively the same. Anyone can view it, however I do not advertise its existence often. Will my most personal writing change as a result of an expansion of possible readership? We shall see.

(download the short version pdf | 56k)

Forced Social Networking!®

Every Bit You Make — andrew on March 6, 2006 at 3:02 pm

EVERY BIT YOU MAKE >>> FINAL PROPOSAL ABSTRACT

splash.gifThe words “Social Networking” retain healthy buzzes in most industries in the city. Everyone knows it’s not what you know, it’s who you know. When your talent, work-ethic, education, and tenacity don’t pay off, your college frat buddies just might. Nederlander’s dad owns a private investment firm and can probably get you in despite your lack of experience. Thank God you didn’t complain too much during the hazing rituals. Or maybe you get introduced to the director you’ve always admired and you know that he might put you in his next movie if you’ll just “do him the favor in return.” No matter how you attain your next job, you’ll inevitably rely on “someone who knows someone” to get that ball rolling. Social Networking is key, but it’s also time-consuming and tedious. What if it could all be done for you. Imagine never having to make that monthly check-in with “the woman you met once from the Altria Group” to make sure she even remembers your name, let alone sees your next project. It doesn’t have to be the stuff of fantasy any more.

Forced Social Networking >>>

Through a semi-illegal and questionably unethical practice knows as “BlueSnarfing” we propose to gather data from various potential users who we think may enjoy the benefits of a world in which they are not continually forced to sustain the daily charade of “interest in other people.” How does the selection process work? Fortunately that work has been done for us. We are only interested in offering our services to those who have attained and sustain a lifestyle which affords them the very technology we propose to exploit. Basically you’ve already selected yourself!

How does it work? Completely unbeknownst to you, (you could be standing in line at Starbucks!) we will gather the contact information from your Bluetooth-enabled phone including phone book and other contact list information. We will then use an (?)asterisk phone server(?) to call the first number on your list and record their response to the subsequent silence coming from our server. The next number on the list is automatically called, the first number’s initial response is played back to the new number, and the new number’s response to the old number’s prompt is recorded. This continues for however many phone numbers you may have in your contact list. The server works not only linearly, but uses every possible combination of caller and receiver until all are exhausted. Your mistress will call your Child’s school Principal! Your mother will call you drug dealer! Hilarity and good social networking are sure to ensue. What protects this egocentric universe of your orbiting contacts from completely disintegrating is anonymity and lack of proof. So although your college sweetheart calls your wife, your wife can’t track the number, even though she may recognize the voice. So-long boring dinner conversation!

The Result of this system is an invigorated phone list and a renewed sense of obligatory connectedness. The by-product of the system (what we are interested in) is the auto-generated conversations that accrue when a number recognizes that voice saying “…hello?..hello…” and responds with “Jim - Jim I can hear you.” only to be the prompt for the next number who may respond with “…Jim…who is Jim?” and subsequently “…I’m not sure…who is this…I don’t know Jim…” and so on and so on into incomprehensible madness. Each snarfed and “forcibly-networked” phone-book will attain it’s own auto-dialogue, unique to your personal and business contacts’ personality and natural temperment.

What can your phone book tell us about you?

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License. | simultaneity